Contrary to the first hypothesis, this study produced no significant difference between the achievement level of those taught by traditional methods and those instructed by the STAD technique LF(1,44)=.122,p=.728) [see table 1]. Both treatment and comparison groups improved approximately ten points on the posttest (see table 2). This may mean that taught by the STAD technique and those taught by traditional methods E(1,45)=.029, II=.865)[see table 3
0 Response to "Contrary to the first hypothesis"